Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robert R. Derber's avatar

Two key comments here. First - you are right, Mike, we 'Gave it away.' Or rather, we sold it. Second - China's actions on REs was a reasonable response to our own blocking actions on them. We picked the fight.

We must develop critical tech. and fund protective industries. But to blame/shame China for this failure is misplaced.

Expand full comment
ChinArb's avatar

Michael, this is "Capital Market Hope," not "Industrial Physics."

I respect your deep knowledge of the auto sector, but you are falling for a classic System A Narrative: "We can bypass the Mine with the Scavenger."

In the ChinArb framework, EMAT isn't a "Point of Light"; it's a Thermodynamic Dead End.

1. The Entropy Trap (Scavenging vs. Extraction) You highlight EMAT’s "edge" as using E-scrap (recycling). Physics Check: Recycling is a High-Entropy process. Collecting, disassembling, and chemically separating millions of iPhones to get grams of Neodymium requires massive energy and logistics. System B (China/Baotou) operates a Low-Entropy process: They dig huge veins of ore and refine it in massive, integrated clusters. To believe EMAT can compete with Baotou is to believe that "Dumpster Diving" can compete with "Industrial Farming" on cost per calorie. It works in a slide deck; it fails on the P&L.

2. The Scale Hallucination Scaling from 660 tons (Korea) to 55,000 tons (US)? That is a Two Orders of Magnitude jump in a country with no skilled metallurgical workforce. China controls 99% of heavy rare earths (Dysprosium/Terbium) not because of "secrets," but because of The R.I.C.E. Protocol: They subsidized the pollution and the Capex for 30 years to build a moat. EMAT trading on NASDAQ doesn't pour concrete. It just prints shares.

3. The Kill Switch Let's assume EMAT actually reaches 55,000 tons. Beijing has a simple button: Price. They can drop the price of Neodymium magnets by 40% overnight (subsidized by state power).

System B absorbs the loss as "Strategic Defense."

EMAT (System A) goes bankrupt because it answers to quarterly earnings.

Michael, recycling is a nice "Green Story." But you cannot build a Tomahawk Missile supply chain on the hope that people recycle their old hard drives. This is not a solution; it is a simulation.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?